Eliran
Mor, MD
Michael Vermesh, MD
The Center for Fertility
and Gynecology
Tarzana, CA
The
roller coaster ride of fertility treatment is emotionally
and physically exhausting. Couples typically begin treatment
with simple and relatively inexpensive interventions
such as ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination
(IUI), and when treatment has failed, progress to injectable
medications and finally in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Each treatment protocol may last up to one month and
several cycles of the same method are often repeated
to maximize chances for success.
The
same is true for the most time consuming and expensive
treatment protocols involving IVF. The IVF process begins,
in most cases, with a downregulation period whereby
natural secretion of endogenous hormones, luteinizing
hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH),
is suppressed (down regulated) prior to initiation of
injections of fertility medications. This is often achieved
using daily injections of a medication called Lupron®.
Once
down regulation is confirmed, by a blood test and an
ultrasound examination, daily injections of fertility
medications (Repronex®, Gonal-F®, or Follistim®)
is begun, often lasting eight to nine days. The purpose
of administering such medications is to stimulate the
ovaries to produce multiple follicles (in a natural
cycle a single follicle is commonly selected for growth
and ovulation), so that multiple eggs harbored in such
follicles can be harvested.The ultrasound examinations
are performed regularly along with blood tests, every
two to three days during the stimulation period, to
follow the development of follicles within the ovaries.
Once
several of the follicles have reached a mature size,
ovulation is induced with yet another injection, human
chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Next, eggs are recovered
from the ovaries 36 hours later in a minor surgical
procedure called transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle
aspiration. Mature eggs are mixed or injected with sperm
(intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI) in a small
dish in the laboratory and fertilization of eggs is
assessed the next morning.
If fertilization had occurred (successful approximately
80% of the time), the development of the now growing
embryo (early fetus) is followed daily until the third
day of the embryo's life (three days after egg retrieval).
Meanwhile, the patient injects herself daily with progesterone
shots in preparation for the embryo transfer procedure.
Next, three day old embryos of the highest quality are
transferred into the patient's uterus using a special
catheter inserted through the patient's cervix. A pregnancy
test is performed 9 to 11 days later.
Now,
imagine failing this process one time. Imagine failing
this process two times. Imagine failing this entire
process three times or more. Devastating? Absolutely!
Couples who have failed IVF multiple times are often
depressed, angry, disappointed, discouraged, and in
general emotionally, physically, and financially drained.
If IVF, the procedure with the highest success rate
for achieving pregnancy, has failed, what other hope
is there?
When
standard IVF and trans-cervical embryo transfer have
failed multiple times, common practice among fertility
specialists has been to offer couples a procedure in
which gametes (eggs and sperm) or zygotes (day-one embryos)
are transferred into the fallopian tubes instead: gamete
intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), or zygote intra-fallopian
transfer (ZIFT).
Several
studies have shown significantly higher success rates
with GIFT or ZIFT as compared to standard IVF. In GIFT
and ZIFT, all steps from downregulation to ovarian stimulation
to egg retrieval, are identical to standard IVF. However,
several important differences exist.
In
a GIFT procedure, retrieved eggs and sperm are mixed
together and transferred into one or both fallopian
tubes (where natural fertilization normally occurs).
In a ZIFT procedure, on the other hand, fertilization
is allowed to take place in the laboratory just like
in standard IVF, however when day-one embryos are formed,
they are transferred into the fallopian tube(s) instead
of the usual transfer of day-three embryos into the
uterus through the cervix, as in standard IVF. The transfer
of gametes, or early embryos, into the fallopian tubes
requires a surgical procedure called a laparoscopy.
Several
limitations exist with either a GIFT or ZIFT procedure.
First, tubal embryo transfer is not suitable for patients
with tubal factor infertility, as at least one normal
tube has to be present. Second, not all fertility programs
can offer this procedure since it requires surgical
intervention at the time of, or one day following, the
egg retrieval procedure.
This
requires that a laboratory equipped to handle gametes
and embryos be in close proximity to an operating room.
Third, success rates, although reported to be higher
than standard IVF when prior IVF cycles have failed,
are only modestly higher and are individualized to different
IVF clinics. In our program, for example, we found that
with prior failed IVF cycles, a GIFT or ZIFT procedure
achieved similar pregnancy success rates to standard
IVF, however were more expensive and potentially risky.
So
what is next? Recently, yet another technique had been
described offering the infertile couple who had exhausted
all other standard treatment modalities (IVF, GIFT,
ZIFT) true hope: combination GIFT/IVF or ZIFT/IVF.
In
these procedures, all known technologies are combined
to maximize success rates. After transfer of gametes
or day-one embryos into the fallopian tube(s) via laparoscopic
surgery (a GIFT or ZIFT procedure), remaining embryos
that had been left to develop in the laboratory are
transferred into the uterus through the cervix two or
three days later, when the embryo is three days old.
The advantage of combined treatment is only one: highest
pregnancy success rates in couples who have failed multiple
prior cycles of standard IVF.
In
a recent review of over 100 of our own cycles of combined
GIFT/IVF and ZIFT/IVF procedures, couples that had failed
on the average at least 2 prior IVF cycles had a clinical
pregnancy rate of 60% across all age groups, the oldest
patient conceiving at age 44 (data soon to be published).
Twin and triplet pregnancy rates were found to be identical
to standard IVF, reassuring that transfer of more gametes
or embryos in the combined procedure did not result
in any significant increase in the multiple gestation
rates, compared to IVF.
Inability
to conceive can be a devastating phenomenon to a couple.
Often times, the road of fertility treatment may be
torturous and full of disappointment. Thanks to medical
advances in the field of Reproductive Endocrinology
and Infertility, couples that had met previous failure
can now be offered new procedures that may significantly
enhance success rates and offer renewed hope.
Read
an Excellent Article on Third Party Reproduction.
|